President Obama Praises Anti-Gay Mills

President Obama Meets with Mills

(Official White House Photo by Pete Souza)

The president of Ghana, John Atta Mills, met with President Obama today at the White House.  During their meeting President Obama praised the West African nation’s strive for democracy.   “Ghana has proven, I think, to be a model for Africa in terms of its democratic practices,” he said.  “And I very much appreciate the efforts that President Mills has taken not only to ensure fair and free elections, but also to root out corruption, increase transparency, make sure that government is working for the people of Ghana and not just for the few.”

I found President Obama’s statement to be particularly interesting in that it failed to acknowledge the struggle the equal rights of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgendered Ghanaians.  Last November President Mills made a controversial statement in response to British Prime Minister Cameron’s call to review aid to African countries that beleaguer homosexuals.  “I, as president of this nation, will never initiate or support any attempts to legalize homosexuality in Ghana,” he said.

Chapter five of the Ghanaian constitution ensures human rights protections “on grounds of gender, race, colour, ethnic origin, religion, creed or social or economic status.”  Neither sexual orientation, nor gender identity are guaranteed protection.  Additionally, in Ghana, “unnatural” sexual relations are prohibited under Criminal Code 1960 – Chapter 6, Sexual Offences Article 105.  This is believed to suggest that homosexual relations are illegal.  “Ghana’s Bureau of National Investigations has been directed to track down and arrest anyone suspected of being gay,” Foreign Policy reported in July, 2011.  In reference to LGBT people, Ghana’s Western Region Minister, Paul Evans Aidoo said “All efforts are being made to get rid of these people in the society,” Foreign Policy wrote.

President Obama also spoke on behalf of President Mills’ efforts to uphold human rights in Ghana.  “Ghana has also been a leader, a responsible actor on the international stage, working in the region to help stabilize and reduce conflict there,” Obama said.  “They’ve been strong partners with us in the United Nations on a whole range of international issues.  And as important, President Mills has consistently spoken out on behalf of human rights and making sure that everyone is treated fairly and not discriminated against inside of his country.”

It’s surprising that although Secretary of State Hillary Clinton fervently expressed the United States’ support for gay rights as human rights, at a convention of the United Nations in Geneva, Switzerland last December, it seemed as though President Obama allowed the issue to slip his mind while meeting alongside the Ghanaian president.

Although the Obama administration has made significant strides toward the equal treatment of LGBT people here in the United States, LGBT rights abroad are as equally important, and should be kept at the same standard.  I think the meeting was a missed opportunity for President Obama to discuss something rather critical to the world stage.

My TOP5 (2/27-3/2)

Here are the top five songs I couldn’t go a day without listening to this week!

#5. No Light, No Light (Florence + The Machine)

Click here to purchase on iTunes

#4. Part of Me (Katy Perry)

Click here to purchase on iTunes

#3. Slipping Away [Crier La Vie] (Moby & Mylène Farmer)

Click here to purchase on iTunes

#2. Y.U. Mad (Birdman feat. Nicki Minaj, Lil Wayne)

Click here to purchase on iTunes

#1. WooHoo (Christina Aguilera feat. Nicki Minaj)

Click here to purchase on iTunes

McDonnell: Children of Gay Parents are Incapable of Achieving American Dream

On Tuesday, the Virginia state Senate voted to approve a bill that will allow religious organizations to refuse the consideration of same-sex partners for adoption based on a “conscience clause.” The bill was passed by a vote of 22-18.  Prior to the bill’s passage, adoption by same-sex couples was already illegal in the Old Dominion state.

At the “State Solutions Conference,” a POLITICO sponsored event held Friday in Washington, D.C., Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell expressed his approval of the Senate’s vote.  “Most of the data that I’ve read that the best environment for a child to grow up to be fully capable of achieving the American dream and having the best start at life in an intact two-parent family made up of a man and a woman,”  he said.  “An intact two-parent family is in fact the best for our country. Should be the model, but when it doesn’t work we have safety nets.”

So, Governor McDonnell… I wonder how accurate this data was that you read.  Did it include Zach Wahls,  the 19-year-old University of Iowa student turned YouTube sensation after his video, ”Two Lesbians Raised A Baby And This Is What They Got,” went viral on the video sharing site?  Because I can assure you, governor, that Mr. Wahl’s has achieved the so-called “American Dream” and this video of his astute testimony to the Congress in opposition of a Joint Resolution to ban gay marriage and civil unions in the state proves it.

What about Vermont’s Evann Orleck-Jetter, who in 2009 at 12-years-old testified in support of a bill to legalize same-sex marriage in the state.  The bill passed in April of the same year after both the House and the Senate voted to override the governor’s veto of the legislation.  “I have been studying the civil rights movement in school, and I’ve learned all about the countless acts of bravery that blacks performed to get their rights,” she said.  “But we still haven’t reached the promised land that Martin Luther King wanted us to reach, because although black boys and white boys and black girls and white girls can play together now, we still don’t accept that two people of the same gender can be together, married with kids of their own. We need to reach the promised land.”

Are children with gay parents really incapable of achieving the American dream?  Or are McDonnell’s words just an excuse to justify backwards religious thinking?
Take a look at these gay couples with children, who in my opinion are fully capable of living successful and fulfilling lives.
Neil Patrick Harris et. al.

Neil Patrick Harris and his partner David Burtka pose with their twins, Gideon Scott and Harper Grace

Sir Elton John and his husband, David Furnish with their son, Zachary Jackson Levon Furnish-John

Ellen and Portia DeGeneres

Ellen DeGeneres and Portia de Rossi at their Wedding in 2008

Although Ellen and Portia DeGeneres do not have children, who is to say that one day they couldn’t raise children in a loving and caring environment, or that their children wouldn’t grow up to be the same as or better than adults with heterosexual parents?

Sorry to burst your conservative Bible thumping bubble, Governor McDonnell, but a 25 year study conducted by the well-known medical journal, Pediatrics, revealed that children with lesbian parents have fewer behavioral problems and greater self-confidence than children who were raised by heterosexual couples.  “The 17-year-old daughters and sons of lesbian mothers were rated significantly higher in social, school/academic, and total competence and significantly lower in social problems, rule-breaking, aggressive, and externalizing problem behavior than their age-matched counterparts,” the study reports.

According to the Human Rights Campaign’s Family Project, at least one in three female same-sex couples and one in five male same-sex couples nationwide are raising children.  An estimated 65,000 adopted children are living with a lesbian or gay parent, and an estimated 2 million lesbian, gay and bisexual people are interested in adopting children.  Imagine how many well mannered, intelligent, motivated and self-confident children our country would have if state’s like Virginia didn’t impose laws making it increasingly difficult for well deserving same-sex couples to adopt and raise them.

My TOP5! (2/20-2/24)

Here are the top five songs I couldn’t go a day without listening to this week! Enjoy!

#5. Feel So Close (Calvin Harris)

#4. Birthday Cake (Rihanna feat. Chris Brown)

#3. Ordinary Things (Lukas Graham)

#2. Part of Me (Katy Perry)

#1. Starships (Nicki Minaj)

Komen’s Cancerous Crusade and the Religious Rite

Komen’s Cancerous Crusade
and the Religious Rite

I had trouble sleeping last night.  I’ve been thinking a lot about Susan G. Komen for the Cure, the ever-popular breast cancer awareness organization, and its decision to douse funding it provided to Planned Parenthood for breast cancer screenings to low income patients because it is the country’s largest reproductive health services provider (including abortions).

It’s amazing how some organizations can be so influential with their support for humanitarian causes like stopping the spread of cancer, or ending world poverty, yet in an instant they can turn a blind eye on their supporters and lash out, citing asymmetrical religious views as sufficient excuses for radical actions.  In addition to Komen’s depraved actions, Catholic Charities also comes to mind.

In February, 2010 the organization, renowned for its adoption and foster care programs and its efforts to end poverty, threatened to eliminate its foster case and public adoption program in the District due to the impending enactment of the marriage equality bill passed by the council in December, 2009.  Just because it would be forced to consider same-sex couples as possible candidates for adoption or foster care, the organization made the subversive move to cut programs that would give homes to hundreds of deserving children.

However, despite the adversity among Catholic extremists, it is both uplifting and ironic to learn that those practicing the faith are not as committed to the cause as it may seem.

In a statement released Tuesday, noting the media’s positive response to the Obama administration’s move to protect access to affordable birth control for women, Cecile Richards, president of Planned Parenthood, made note of an interesting fact regarding her organization’s most outspoken opponent – the Catholic Church.  Richard’s cited a study conducted by the Guttmacher Institute which reports that 98 percent of sexually experienced Catholic women will have used birth control at some point in their lives.

Although Komen dropped Planned Parenthood due to its pro-abortion stance, 98 percent of Catholic women use contraceptives at some point during their lives.  This trend exhibits a weakening stamina of the Catholic Churches teachings which, surprising or not, have always been on the decline when it comes to the Churches stance on social issues.

In an October, 1980 article in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, Ellen Goodman, the Pulitzer prize winning columnist who has always been outspoken about women’s rights and LGBT issues, wrote that “In this country, a full 76.5 percent of Catholic women are using birth control and almost all of them are using a form condemned by the pope.”  In the 31 years since 1980, the amount of Catholic women using some sort of birth control has drastically risen, despite the Catholic Churches teaching.

Goodman continues by referencing a quote from Archbishop John Quinn of San Francisco who said that the “impasse on this moral teaching… is harmful to the church.”  The bishop recognizes the apparent problem, yet today next to nothing has been done to counteract what he views as a problem.

The same can be said about same-sex marriage.  A 2011 study conducted by the Public Religion Research Institute found that 53 percent of Catholics support same-sex marriages, and fifty-six percent do not believe that gay sexual relations are sinful.  Once again, despite this the Church, along with organizations like the National Organization for Marriage and all of the republican presidential candidates are pushing for what they claim to be ‘traditional’ marriage, between two people of the opposite sex.

MetroWeekly reported yesterday that Komen’s Karen Handel, senior vice-president for public policy, was being lauded by anti-abortion site, LifeNews, for defunding Planned Parenthood.  The LGBT magazine also surfaced an NBC affiliate’s 2010 interview in which Handel asserts that she is also against same-sex marriage and civil unions.  Given Handel’s position, I wonder how Komen stands on the issue of gay rights?

What is mind boggling to me is that although the majority of those who identify as Catholic are often reported by the media as having more progressive points of view than their Vatican counterparts, Catholic leaders are so enticed by their own beliefs that they fail to acknowledge the overwhelming opinions of their own people.  If 98 percent of Catholic women use birth control and 53 percent of Catholics support same-sex marriage or civil unions, why does the Vatican continue to push archaic beliefs?

The Church should consider opening a dialogue with its parishioners who are taking progressive stands while continuing to commit a parts of their lives (and money) to the institution.  I can only imagine how some pro-abortion/lgbt rights Komen supports must feel about the recent news, and I wonder how many other organizations out there hold stances similar to hers.  As much as it pains me to say – I think the Catholic Church is to blame.

UPDATE: The Susan G. Komen foundation’s Board of Directors, as well as its Founder and CEO Nancy G. Brinker, released a statement today apologizing for their decision to slash its funding of Planned Parenthood.  The foundation has decided to reevaluate and amend its criteria for funding once again, which would allow Planned Parenthood to continue receiving aid. 

“We want to apologize to the American public for recent decisions that cast doubt upon our commitment to our mission of saving women’s lives,” the statement reads.  “The events of this week have been deeply unsettling for our supporters, partners and friends and all of us at Susan G. Komen…Our original desire was to fulfill our fiduciary duty to our donors by not funding grant applications made by organizations under investigation.  We will amend the criteria to make clear that disqualifying investigations must be criminal and conclusive in nature and not political. That is what is right and fair.”

The Impact of Catholic Clergy on the Lives of LGBTQ Youth

“Just as I have loved you, you should also love one another.”

This post is in response to several posts within the ‘homosexuality’ category of the Q&A section of Disciples Now – an online ministry that offers advice to young Catholics.  The indented paragraphs in this post are excerpts taken from the site.  The original posts can be accessed here.

I’ve read all your answers to questions about homosexuality, but I have one that hasn’t been addressed. Would it be wrong to have a same-sex partner if there was no sexual intimacy? Or if it didn’t go beyond kissing? I’ve been told that the sin in homosexual lifestyle is the fact that sexual intimacy is only meant for heterosexual married couples. I can accept that. But is it wrong for a girl to kiss another girl as long as it doesn’t lead to further action? If boy/girl dating couples aren’t sinning by mild affection (kissing and hugging) even though they aren’t married, why is it considered a sin for a girl to kiss a girl under the same circumstances?

- Feeling the discrimination

Answer:

Signs of affection like hugging are acceptable among any persons who consider themselves friends.  But to take it further, even to the level of kissing, is not something that is acceptable among mere friends.  People engage in that kind of behaviour as part of the “courtship” process, i.e. the process of finding their marriage partner.  Since the Church defines marriage as the sacramental union of a man and a woman for two persons of the same sex to engage in that type of behaviour would be a violation of the nature of that kind of physical expression.  Certainly there is no sin in two homosexual persons sharing a deep friendship.  But they would always have to guard against the temptation to move beyond friendship and the types of affection that are acceptable among friends, to behaviour that would be sinful.

- fr bob

This was awfully disappointing to read.  I shouldn’t be surprised because almost all Catholic priests are closed minded, but there is something about this post that just breaks my heart.  Priests are figures young people of faith are supposed to admire and look up to.  Luckily for me, I’ve learned to accept the ignorance of my Church – the Catholic Church.  Whether they are straight or gay, I know my God would never deny the love shared between two individuals.  Unfortunately, most Catholic youth who are questioning their sexuality are not strong enough to come to this realization until after they have fully accepted themselves for who they are.

This answer is the kind of thing that deepens self-hatred in gay and questioning youth.  It is exactly the kind of message that leads them to doubt their self-worth and to contemplate suicide.   Priests should be ashamed of themselves for offering this kind of “advice” and flaunting it as if they are helping improve the general wellness of our world.  Forgive me for ‘lashing out’ against members of the clergy, but the Catholic Church needs more of its people spreading positive messages to ALL of its young parishioners, not just those who are heterosexual.

I have been in a committed same-sex relationship for over a year now, and the connection that I share with my boyfriend far surpasses those shared between friends.  I do not believe that the love my partner and I share is sinful, and I refuse to believe that God would put my belief up for debate.

Fr. Bob fails to acknowledge that the individual who asked the question was obviously implying a relationship between two women or two men beyond that of a friendship.  While stating that kissing between two people of the same sex is sinful, he implies that kissing between opposite sex couples is not a sin because it is part of a “courtship process” paving the path toward marriage.  It has always been my perception that the Catholic Church believes that any form of sexual interaction outside of marriage whether it be gay or straight is thought to be sinful.  Yet, when it comes to differentiating between what is apparently wrong and what is apparently right, it is okay to twist Biblical “rules” and omit this detail.

The message he is sending here is that it is not okay to be gay.  He is denying God’s creation of those who identify as anything but heterosexual.  Sexuality, whether we like it or not, boils down to who one desires to interact with on a sexual level.  Sexuality is not about love.  It is not about friendship.  It is about sex.  Heterosexuals desire to engage in sexual relations with those of the opposite sex, homosexuals desire to engage in sexual relations with those of the same sex, and bisexuals desire to engage in sexual relations with those of both sexes.  If it is a sin for me to kiss my boyfriend just because our biological sex is identical, then what is the point of accepting our sexuality and forming a relationship because of it in the first place?  By telling someone that even a kiss between two people of the same sex is sinful, Fr. Bob is telling Catholic gay and questioning youth that in order to be without sin they should fight against their sexual desires, hiding them so that they may live in accordance with God.  The message here is harrowing:  Because homosexuality is a sin, and one’s sexuality cannot be changed, what value are gay and questioning youth supposed to see in the continuation of their lives?  What kind of message is this??

Another question:

I am a fifteen-year-old male, and I feel that I might be bisexual. However, while throughout time I switch between feeling homosexual and heterosexual, I feel a lot better when I feel attracted to girls; it seems to me much more real and genuine. Despite this, I know that homosexuality is wrong and abominable in the eyes of God, yet I know that there is little I can do to help myself besides praying and trying to stay out of premarital sex. I have read that many males my age have a homosexual phase in their lives (this started around seventh grade, I’m now in ninth grade) but what they might think to be homosexual desires actually is just “hero worship” or forming the personal identity. I don’t feel that this is just a phase, and I really detest my homosexual attractions, but I just can’t get rid of them. I want to be straight almost more than I want to be able to breathe, because I really don’t want Hell or to offend God. What should I do?

Answer:

Don’t be so quick to rule out this as a phase.  The fact that you experience attraction to girls makes it clear that you aren’t homosexual.  Just because you experience attraction to other males (not an uncommon occurence in adolescence) doesn’t mean you have to act on those attractions.  Most importantly turn to God daily for the help that you need; He will not leave you abandoned!
-Fr Bob

In a 2006 report, published by the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, it is written that “God has created every human person out of love and wishes to grant him or her eternal life in the communion of the Trinity.  All people are created in the image and likeness of God and thus possess an innate human dignity that must be acknowledged and respected.  In keeping with this conviction, the Church teaches that persons with a homosexual inclination ‘must be accepted with respect, compassion, and sensitivity.”

How does one who preaches the word of God consider it respectful, compassionate or sensitive to tell someone that their sexual desires are sinful?  As children we are taught that to sin is to go against God.  With sin one cannot enter heaven.  Thus, we must fear sin.  Sin must be confessed through penance and reconciliation.  Is it respectful, compassionate and sensitive to teach our gay and questioning youth to fear acting on their sexuality by kissing someone of the same sex?  Is it respectful, compassionate and sensitive to tell someone that their innate sexuality is sinful and should be feared if acted upon?

After reading the USCCB’s statement, it would seem that to be respectful, compassionate and sensitive about one’s “homosexual inclination” calls for the acceptance of one’s desire to kiss the one he loves, and for this action to be carried out free of sin.  If this form of interaction cannot be respected because sexual interactions outside of marriage are sinful, then why can’t members of the same sex marry?  It seems to me that a lifelong commitment to one’s partner would solve this problem of “sin”.

As a teenage boy I would have given anything to hear a Catholic priest or parishioner from my Church speak out in support of gay love.  I confessed my sexuality to my priest, fearing the “sin” my body had desired to live ever since I was a young boy.  At the time, he remained neutral, but neutral in a way that I was able to think positively about my sexual attraction toward men.  In my college years I found a Catholic community of priests and parishioners that openly supports gay love.  I am thankful that I did not discover this site when I was struggling with my sexuality and longing for support.

Gay and questioning youth deserve to be treated with respect, compassion and sensitivity by all people, especially by those who hold religious leadership.  Although this site offers powerful insight into the lives of Catholic youth, I would not recommend it to those struggling with the relationship between faith and sexuality because it does nothing but continue to spread the Vatican’s misconception of God’s word – his truth.  God loves everyone.  God would not have created homosexual, bisexual or even transgendered people if he considered their lives to be sinful.  It’s common sense in my mind.  I just wait for the day that someone in Catholic leadership will be brave enough to admit that it is common sense in their mind as well.

A Taste of Freedom for Same-Sex Binational Couples

A Taste of Freedom

This past summer the United States witnessed the finalization of the repeal of Don’t Ask Don’t Tell (DADT), legislation which prohibited gay and lesbian citizens from serving openly in the United States military since 1993.  It was a monumental shift in the continuous struggle for the equal rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgendered Americans.  However, with the end of one battle, another conflict is on its way to the forefront of America’s hot button political issues – the fight against unequal marriage. 

With the necessary support, the resolution might seem quite simple – to pass LGBT inclusive legislation at the state or national level.  However, a bill or amendment will not put the issue to rest entirely.  For 28,500 known couples, marriage is not as easy as gathering in the city hall of a legalized state and placing a ring on each other’s finger.  For those with foreign born partners, the issue at hand is much more complex – an innate struggle toward a legal recognition and citizenship.

The hardships are all too familiar for Rick Hess and his partner Gonzalo Azcona.  The couple has been living apart for two years due to the unsteady climate for same-sex binational relationships in the United States. 

Hess, 54, grew up on a farm in a very conservative Mennonite family and community in Lancaster, Pennsylvania.  As a 10th generation American, he has always had a profound curiosity for international exploration – so one shouldn’t be surprised to find out that the man of his dreams dawns from Cordoba, a province of Central Argentina, Northwest of Buenos AiresWhile working as a Senior Vice President at Oracle Corporation, a major technology multinational, Hess lived in both Europe and Asia for over five years.  In Europe he met a Swiss gentleman with whom he developed a strong relationship that lasted nearly 11 years.  They faced significant immigrations hardships and even hired a lawyer to take on their case.  However, in 2003 their unsurpassable conflict with the U.S. immigrations system were too much for Hess and his Swiss partner to bear and they called it quits. 

Gonzalo Azcona, 31, is currently living in Buenos Aires, Argentina – the country’s capital.  Azcona studied Industrial Engineering for five years while working for his family’s business – a company which specializes in the manufacturing of rubber soles for shoes.  In 2007 Azcona had a change of heart and decided to take his career in a new direction by beginning to study Industrial Design.  Through it all, he dated an Argentine lawyer for three and a half years, ending the relationship peacefully out of settled differences.

In 2007, although they had not yet met, Hess and Azcona shared similar states of mind.  Hess was working on transitioning from full-time executive employment to investing, working in the non-profit world, and enjoying life in a more relaxed manner.  Azcona was working a stressful job, as head of finance and administration of his family’s business.  Hess and Azcona desired happier, more fulfilling lives.  They found their solace on a website designed for mature men interested in meeting young bachelors all over the world, and vice-versa.  Although they were unaware of it at the time, this aboriginal, low-budget website would soon go above and beyond and grant them their gold.     

In January, 2008, Rick was exploring the site when he came across Gonzalo’s profile.  A simple ‘nice pic and profile’ by Hess was enough to spark up a conversation between the two.  “We started ‘camming’ and chatting regularly,” Hess said.  “We also started speaking by phone.”  Only one month later, in February the couple decided to meet for the first time in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.  Azcona recalls feeling anxious about meeting his international lover, but as he was in Rio vacationing with friends, he set his expectations low for their first encounter.  “I never expected anything to come out of [our meeting], I just wanted to talk with him,” he said.  Hess, on the other hand was optimistic – after all, he did travel over 6,000 miles to meet him after only one month.  When the two met the chemistry was charismatic “It was one of those rare encounters – love at first sight,” Hess said.       

In Rio, Hess also met Azcona’s friends for the first time.  “Rick is very outgoing.  He likes to talk and he is friendly,” Azcona said when asked about his friends’ perception of his newfound companion.  Although they loved Hess, Azcona’s friends were initially concerned.  “They were telling me, ‘what are you going to do?  He is going to be in the U.S. and you are here,” he recalled.  But, upon meeting Rick, Azcona had made up his mind.  The distance was never a question for him.  “From the very beginning, I told my friends that I wanted to be with him, so they encouraged me to fight for it,” he said.  

The next four years would forever change their lives.  With multiple trips between Argentina and the United States, the nearly 6,500 miles that separated the couple were virtually non-binding.  At the start, Azcona began visiting the States on a regular basis – his first trip in 2008.  “I visited the U.S. for 3 months in 2008, for six months and then nine in 2009,” he said.  In the States their relationship blossomed.  Hess refers to this time as their ‘honeymoon’ stage.  “I took him all over the country.  I could show him our California residences.  We went to Washington, DC for the first time, Pennsylvania and New York, to sporting events”  Throughout their time together in the United States, Hess and Azcona, along with Maggie and Emma – their two Bernese Mountain dogs (which they refer to as ‘the girls’), had become a family.  They own two properties in California, share mutual friends and have integrated with each others’ loved ones.

Hess, Azcona and the Girls enjoy a day together at Lake Tahoe

The couple lived together for the majority of the first two years of their relationship; however, December 2009 saw a radical shift in their situation.  Azcona had arrived in Miami, Florida and was going through U.S. Customs and Border Protection when an immigration agent pulled him aside into an interrogation room for questioning.  “He was questioning me about everything,” Azcona remembered.  “He asked why I had come to the U.S. for three fourths of the previous year.  He asked what I was doing there and whether I was living and working in the U.S. or in Argentina.  He then began to go through my luggage.”  Becoming detained at the border is the worst nightmare for any binational couple.  According to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Customs and Border Protection agents reserve the right to hand search baggage and even seize laptops, cameras, cellular phones and other digital devices without suspicion. 

Azcona was terrified throughout the entirety of his interrogation.  Afterward he called Hess to tell him what had happened.  “I said to him, ‘we need to figure out how we’re going to do this because this is the last time I’m coming here without a plan.”  Hess looks back on his partner’s experience with both regret and understanding.  “When he called me he was so upset,” he said.  “I was angry.  I just wanted to go down there and give these guys some shit, but in hindsight I understand that they were just doing their job.”  Customs stamped Azcona’s passport for 7 February 2010 and told him he had one day of leeway to leave the country.  He hasn’t been back since.  “That was the first taste of reality,” Hess said.  “I remember thinking to myself, ‘we’re going to have a struggle here.” 

Since then Hess has traveled to Argentina several times and has even looked into multiple business opportunities in the country.  As a non-Spanish speaker, Hess has had some difficulty adjusting to the new culture, but overall he has had a wonderful experience and has come to know Gonzalo’s family very well.  “Despite our age difference, his family has accepted me as one of their own,” Hess said. 

When they are apart, technology helps to minimize the distance between the pair.  Whether it’s via Skype, Facebook, telephone or e-mail – Hess and Azcona always remain in contact.  “We write each other e-mail every morning and we speak by phone before bed at night,” Azcona said.  “Without technology, we’d struggle to be together.”  Hess and Azcona are by no means perfect.  The distance has contributed to problems to their relationship.  “Sometimes you feel really sad for something – anything – and you don’t have your partner there,” Azcona said.  “Sometimes you need someone – I mean, you need HIM to be there to comfort you.”  The two assert that their problems are not insurmountable.  Physically or electronically, the most important thing for both Hess and Azcona is to be together.  “We go to bed at night by ourselves and we wake up lonely,” Azcona said.  “We both know that we must be together.”

Unlike heterosexual binational couples, marriage is not a feasible solution for Hess and Azcona.  “As an American man, if I had met an international woman, we would get married and she would receive an immediate green card,” Hess said.  Unfortunately, the Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders (GLAD) association, a New England based organization which fights for LGBT legal rights, advises same-sex binational couples to refrain from legally marrying.  “Foreign nationals should not marry without consulting an experienced immigration attorney.  Marrying your partner will not help fix immigration problems. In fact, marrying your same-sex partner or applying for a change in immigration status based on a marriage to a same sex partner could lead to deportation or future denials of visa applications,” an advisory from the organization said.  To some, however, the tide is beginning to changeMartha McDevitt-Pugh, founding member of Love Exiles – an international community of binational American citizens living abroad, in exile with their foreign born partners – and longtime friend of Hess’, believes binational couples should not remain silent.  “Binational couples do need to be aware of the risks and make their own assessment,” she said.  “For those of us living outside the USA, we would be denying ourselves basic human rights if we refused to marry out of fear of what could happen.” 

Marriage equality in the States will do practically nothing for same-sex binational couples until the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) is repealed in Congress.  Section three of DOMA prohibits U.S. natives from sponsoring their foreign born partners for green cardsHowever, advances are being made to rid the States of this anti-gay policy.  In February, 2011 the Obama administration declared DOMA unconstitutional and ordered the U.S. Department of Justice to stop defending the legislation in courtDespite this ruling, binational couples are still being deported.  United States Senator Diane Feinstein has introduced The Respect for Marriage Act, legislation that would repeal DOMA, and on 10 November the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee voted 10-8 to approve her bill for debate.  “One of our biggest problems is the world’s limited awareness of what’s up against us legally,” Hess said.  “I can’t even begin to tell you how many of our friends have told us, ‘Why don’t you just get married in New York, Massachusetts, or another state which marries same-sex couples?”  The harsh truth is that there are only 20 countries in the world that acknowledge same-sex partners for immigration purposes.  Unfortunately for Hess and Azcona, the United States is not one of those countries.

Hess has been active in ensuring a better future for himself and other same-sex binational couples.  In 2008 Hess was a major donor and fundraiser for the Obama campaign, and he has spoken to the President about his situation with Azcona.  Hess has also met with the U.S. Ambassador to Argentina, Senator Feinstein and John Davidson, a highly experienced lawyer and representative from Lambda Legal – an LGBT legal rights group.

Although their marital future is uncertain, one thing is for sure – the two are convinced that in the end they will be together.  “I’m not afraid to lose him,” Azcona said.  “It’s not a question of if I want to be with Rick.  It’s a question of how.”  The couple has considered several options:  1] Living together Canada, or another country that welcomes binational same-sex couples with open arms.  2] The couple seriously considered Hess’ move to Buenos Aires in 2011, and even took steps toward renting his U.S. properties in order to do so, and 3] They have begun working with immigration lawyers in the States to find the best possible way for Azcona to live in California with Hess and the girls.

Azcona is hesitant to make any move without positive assurance for success.  “The last time I went to the States I had no fears,” he said.  “I left my job and my apartment, and I didn’t finish at the university.  But, now I have to do it all again, and if it fails…”  Azcona shrugged his shoulders.  Hess is a successful business man and is currently running several companies.  Azcona, on the other hand, is still finding his niche. “Rick is in a different part of his life – he has more freedom,” Azcona said.  “My point of view is that I need to work hard to build a future so that I can contribute financially to our partnership.”  Whatever the two decide, the couple is lucky to have the full support of their families and friends.  “Gon & Rick should have the chance to choose what the best place for them to be together to start a family is,” Javier Valez, a friend of Azcona’s said.  “I understand that for this purpose, either Argentina or the U.S. would be possible choices, but the most important thing is that they must be able to choose.  That choice should be based in their necessities, possibilities, expectations and dreams, not by external variables to their dreams.”

Hess and Azcona are prepared for the fight against the United States’ immigration system.  “When you love someone and you want to be with him, you will do anything in your power to be together,” Azcona said with a sheepish smile.  This holiday season, while sitting down with your family for a delicious meal – whether it be Christmas dinner, a Karamu feast, a celebration of the end of Hanukkah, or just to appreciate being amongst the ones you admire most – take a moment to remember that not everyone shares this privilege. 

Whether they are same-sex binational couples with immigrations restrictions, loved ones serving in our armed forces or parents whose jobs requires them to reside in countries other than their own – there are thousands of families who are forced to remain apart for the holidays.     Luckily Hess and Azcona are fortunate enough to spend this year together, but one can only speculate about the future.  For now, Hess and Azcona, along with all same-sex binational couples, can only hope for the greatest gift of all – a taste of America’s freedom.            

Montevideo Rallies For Change

On 30 September I attended a pro-equality march in Montevideo, Uruguay.  I was surprised to find over 2,000 supporters ready to express their support for equal marriage in the small South American country.  The march was definitely a lot of fun.

Uruguay is expected to be the next Latin American country to legalize marriage between same-sex couples.  Since April, 2011 the country’s parliament has been reviewing a proposal that would do just that.  Civil unions have been legal since 2008.

Global Gays: The Media’s Influence on the World’s Perception of Homosexuality

Global Gays

The media has held a significant role in determining the ways in which society views different groups within its culture.  Everyday countless individuals are influenced by American television programs which are aired around the world.  The impact of the media is endless when it comes to shaping ones perception of man.  There is a world-wide notion that gay men are flamboyant and outgoing.  Although this is nothing new, media outlets continue to strengthen the false impression that all gay men are eccentric and high fashioned, fornicating like rabbits in the club and worshiping their shrines to Madonna and Lady Gaga on a daily basis.  Through the ways in which they are portrayed on television programs, in advertisements and in movies, the media sets limitations on society’s notion of what a gay man can be.

The media establishes a society’s norms.  It enacts the standard for what is considered normal behavior for particular groups in a society.  For instance, cable television programming reinforces the idea that heterosexism is the norm, while anything remotely homosexual is considered taboo.  It is extremely rare to find a commercial showcasing a family with same-sex parents or a gay couple.  Moreover, writers don’t script LGBT characters for lead roles in mainstream programming.  When they do, the shows don’t last long.  The ratings for Ellen DeGeneres’ 90’s sitcom, Ellen dropped drastically after she came out as gay on the show.  ABC, the shows network on cable TV was sharply criticized by anti-gay religious groups for bringing “gay content” into the public eye.  This led the network to add a parental advisory warning at the start of each episode.  Eventually Ellen was cancelled in 1998.

On the contrary, subscribers to premium networks like Showtime and HBO have long been exposed to gender and sexual diversity.  Shows like Niptuck, Entourage, The L Word and Six Feet Under have had plenty of homosexual characters and references in the past.  However, because one must pay to access these channels, their power is limited to those who can afford to subscribe to such networks.

When norms and representation are combined, the power of the media is endless.  Just as a strong heterosexual presence on cable television has had negative effects on society, the ways in which homosexuality is exhibited on television can also have negative effects on viewers’ perceptions of the gay community.  Two shows which stand out are Will and Grace (on cable television) and Queer as Folk (on HBO).   Although the protagonists in both shows are gay characters, their parts are written to reflect societal stereotypes of the gay community.  In this case, the media is the driving force for the formulation of judgment against LGBT identifying persons.  Will and Grace promoted the abstraction that all gay men have one close female friend with whom he shares everything with – from information his sex life to suggestions on what makes his girl look sexy enough for her night out on the town.  Will and Grace established the idea of the ‘fag hag.’  The show opened the flood gates for young straight women to desire a boy loving male companion – a ‘gay BFF’ that would act as her personal shopping assistant and tell her what bra made her boobs look big enough to lace her Friday night date into wanting to go down on her.  He would coach her on how to give the world’s most satisfying blow job and be her gaydar in times of uncertainty over a cute guy’s sexual preference.

Likewise, Queer as Folk portrayed gay men in a provocative manner, often by promoting casual sexual encounters between macho men, dressed head to toe in Abercrombie and Fitch, speaking with the stereotypical high pitched ‘gay’ voice.  If the show were to be rebroadcast on mainstream television, its delineation of the gay community would act as kindle – fueling the fire of those who promote marriage between one man and one woman.

The media’s predominance over the lives of its viewers is noticeable even in the people it exemplifies.  Whether in Boston, Buenos Aires or Beijing, it is likely that one will find that the majority of gay men assume the role of the Will and Grace/ Queer as Folk gay persona.  Without these television shows, society would lack a singular consensus of who the cookie cutter gay male is.  The behaviors would still exist for some, but one may not immediately create a parallel between ones actions and homosexuality.  In the Ancient Greece, for example, homosexuality was considered a societal normAccording to French philosopher, Luc Brisson, in his book Sexual Ambivalence, long before the age of the visual media, tension did not exist between those who were gay and those who were straight.  It was ordinary for men to interact with other men on a sexual level.  Can you imagine Agathon sipping a cosmopolitan and gossiping with his fag hag over his latest rendezvous with so-and-so’s husband who is definitely packing in his pants (…or should I say, toga?).

Although it may seem absurd to some, the media is overwhelmingly responsible for the thoughts and behaviors of its consumers.  This entire blog was created on the recognition that most gays are considered to be puking rainbows and that society looks past the possibility that there can be gay men who are not completely submerged in the stereotype.  That said, the climate is beginning to change.  In recent years there have been more and more award winning programs that are beginning to shift the media in a new direction.  Shows like Glee, Modern Family and Brothers and Sisters have begun chipping away at this hetronormative blockade by introducing popular principal characters who identify as lesbian, gay or bisexual.  These shows have begun influencing younger generations to think with open minds.  Perhaps this is the beginning of the future – a silent agent of change whose prevalence will soon be felt across the globe.     

Sandwich Sanctuary

In June I began a full-time temporary position at an agency that stocks shelves at the local Wal-Mart.  I work from 5 a.m. to 2 p.m. Monday through Friday.  It’s easy work, but it has its quirks (I’ll write about it soon…).  The nine hour day goes by rather quickly… we have an hour lunch break, and every two hours we’re required to take a 15 minute break.  I work with a very diverse group of people.  There are 10 of us working together on several tasks each day.  I’m not “out” to most of my co-workers.  If you know anything about Wal-Mart and the caliber of its employees, you’d understand why.

Three weeks ago a co-worker of mine asked me to come to Subway with him during one of our fifteen minute breaks.  The Subway sits in the entrance of the store and is a popular “hang out” for many of the workers from the agency.  Usually I take my breaks outside, sitting in my car or under the shade – eight hour days inside become mind numbing after a while.  I decided to go with him for a change because I had not spoken to him as much as I had the others.  After I washed my hands and took a drink of water, I ventured into the Subway and sat in the booth next to my co-worker.  We were shortly joined by two others  invited to the spot.

The initial conversation was quite dry.  We discussed our college majors and what we’re doing in the fall.  The co-worker who invited me to the restaurant said that he is going to college to become a pastor.  I thought, “Great… the gay guy and the pastor sitting together in the Wal-Mart Subway… progress (haha).”  I mentioned that I’m going to Uruguay in August to visit my boyfriend before spending five months studying in Argentina.  Of course, I replaced ‘boyfriend’ with ‘family,’ out of priestly caution.  My co-workers were impressed – they aren’t the most culturally seasoned bunch, so they had a lot of questions.  I explained the stark differences between Argentina and the United States.  I couldn’t help but mention the gay adoptions, marriage and military service are all legal in the country.

One co-worker applauded my remarks and said that anyone should be able to marry who ever they want.  The future pastor, on the other hand had a different opinion.  “I believe what the Bible says,” he interjected.  Within minutes my co-worker’s agenda (though, at the time I wouldn’t have called it such) came to light.  He began talking about the Bible and homosexuality, the Bible and Christ, the Bible and human behavior.  I was surprised.  Though I don’t mind blogging about it, I don’t like to discuss religion in public.  It’s one of those hot topics that usually gets people wound up.

I looked at my watch – 12:14.  “YES!” I thought.  “I’m going to get back to work,” I said to the group, before standing up and walking, steadfast out of the Subway.  I wasn’t about to stay and listen to my co-worker tear apart my belief that God loves all of his children and wouldn’t deny anyone the right to marry and have children.

Last week the same co-worker invited me, once again, to come and sit with him in the Subway during our 15 minute break.  I could have said no, but part of me was truly interested in what he had to say.  This time it was just the two of us.  Shortly after we took our seats he mentioned religion.

“Remember the last time you were sitting with us, over there” (He points to the table we sat in two weeks earlier).

“When we were discussing religion,” I said.

“Yes,” he said.  “You were very quiet.”

Seriously? I thought.  I knew it was coming.

“So.. what do you think?”  he said.

“About what?…Religion?” I questioned, purposely trying to avoid the topic.

I told him that I was Catholic, born and raised.  I told him that I was baptized into the Church and received first Holy Communion and Confirmation.  I wasn’t the least bit surprised about what came next.

“What does it mean to you to be Catholic?” he asked.

I wasn’t sure how to answer.  Honestly, I’ve never really thought about it before.  Sitting face-to-face with the next Rick Warren, his eyes viciously glaring down my throat, felt like an awkward confession gone bad.  I couldn’t think of a good answer – not that I really wanted to give him one.  I blurted out the quickest thing I could think of:  The Nicene Creed.  “Like you said the other day, when we were sitting over there, I too believe in one God, the creator of heaven and earth.”

I could sense that he wasn’t satisfied, and that his intent was to prove me wrong no matter what.  “But, what do you get out of being a Catholic?” he said.  I didn’t want to answer his questions.  I work at Wal-Mart to earn money, not to question my faith in God.

“I’m not quite sure how to answer that question,” I said.  “I’m gay, but it doesn’t affect my religious beliefs.  God loves everybody.”  Whoops!  Haha.. I couldn’t help myself.  He seemed surprised.

“Well now I know why you’re so quite,” he said.

I didn’t argue.

“Have you ever heard of the phrase, ‘born again?’ he asked.

I knew it! I said to myself.  I knew he was a born again Christian.  I could just tell.  He preceded to try and explain to me what a born again Christian was.  It seemed as though he was giving a lecture – everything sounded so scripted.  It was obvious that I wasn’t his first.  I nodded, said “uh-huh,” “Oh,” and “I understand” several times.  I looked at my watch – 12:08.  Of course these 15 minutes would last forever.

He told me that the only way I could get to heaven was to give myself fully up to God and live for him and him only.  Because I am gay, he said I “really need to” be born again or else I would suffer eternally in Hell (not his exact words, but you get the point).  I already understood his point, but he still wasn’t finished with me.

“Let me explain it like this, Joe,” he said.  “Imagine we’re in a helicopter flying over the Grand Canyon -” He pointed to the table as if I was supposed to imagine it were the top of the canyons.  “The canyon is separated by a big gorge and the two sides will never touch,” he continued.  “God is on the right side, and the sinners, that’s YOU Joe, are on the left.”

I was thoroughly amused, but let him continue.

“NOTHING you do can get you to the other side with God.  No matter how many times you go to Church, work at soup kitchens, help the elderly, or work at Wal-Mart – NOTHING will ever be good enough to get you to God.”

“The only thing you can do is be born again.”  He said.  “Do you get what I’m trying to say?”

I looked at my clock, it was 12:20.  Break was OVER.  We stood up and walked back to the area we were working in.  The entire walk back, he continued to try and explain the importance of being born again, this time quoting the Jesus and the Bible and relating it to his cause.

Things began to make sense.  In a previous conversation we discovered that I went to high school with his best friend – someone I knew quite well from my senior year Literature class.  We had an assignment to write wishes on a piece of paper and post them in the back of the room.  At the time, I was still in a relationship with a girl and very much absent minded when it came to my sexual orientation.  However, I was still a strong proponent for equal rights, thus my wish was for marriage equality for all – “because if my girlfriend and I could get married, why couldn’t two men or two women?”

In the weeks after we posted our assignment on the board, my co-worker’s best friend would sit next to me at the lunch table, Bible in hand, and read aloud phrases against homosexuality and same-sex marriage.  Although I had not yet recognized my homosexuality as fact, I knew very well that I was attracted to men.  You can only imagine the weight his friend placed on me each time he would read the scripture, insistent on it’s hetero-only rhetoric.  The burden was not out of fear of God (I’ve always pictured him wearing one of those Legalize Gay t-shirts), but because I knew that one day, if my homosexual thoughts did not wear off, I’d have to live in a society where people like him walk in multiples.

I would have never expected to be reminded of this, three years later while working a summer job at Wal-Mart.  Next time my co-worker continues to invite new colleagues to join him in his sandwich sanctuary, I’ll politely abstain.  After all, when Jesus said, “I am the bread of life,”  I don’t think he was talking about a five dollar foot long.